Which of the following is NOT an effective strategy for developing academic language?

Choosing to assign relatable fictional books is not typically considered an effective strategy for developing academic language. While fictional narratives can certainly engage students and promote reading comprehension, they may not specifically target the nuances and vocabulary commonly found in academic discourse. Academic language involves specialized terminology, complex sentence structures, and formal discourse that is more often found in non-fiction texts, scholarly articles, or informational materials rather than in fictional literature.

On the other hand, making academic language comprehensible involves teaching strategies that clarify and simplify complex concepts and vocabulary for students, ensuring they can understand and use this language effectively. Using graphic organizers helps students structure their thoughts, visualize relationships, and make connections between ideas—key skills in mastering academic language. Teaching students about cognates leverages their existing knowledge of their first language to help them understand English vocabulary, particularly in cases where similar words exist in both languages, thereby enhancing their academic vocabulary.

Thus, while all the other strategies directly focus on building the academic language skills needed for success in an educational setting, assigning relatable fictional books lacks the targeted approach that enhances students' academic language proficiency.